Wigmore

United States v. Wigmore

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202625-4609California206 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-4609 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:18-cr-00036-SPW-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JEROME LAWRENCE WIGMORE, Jr.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Jerome Lawrence Wigmore, Jr. appeals from the sentence of 6 months’

imprisonment and 30 months of supervised release imposed following the district

court’s revocation of supervised release.

Wigmore’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Wigmore has

not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.