United States v. Smith

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202625-3842California340 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-3842 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:16-cr-00279-TSZ-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAJUAN SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Dajuan Smith appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised

release and imposing a 24-month sentence to run consecutively to Smith’s state-

court sentence, to be followed by a 4-month supervised release term.

Smith’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.