United States v. Smith
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202625-3842California340 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-3842 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:16-cr-00279-TSZ-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
DAJUAN SMITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2026**
Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Dajuan Smith appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised
release and imposing a 24-month sentence to run consecutively to Smith’s state-
court sentence, to be followed by a 4-month supervised release term.
Smith’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for…