Rojas-Espinoza
Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202624-7536California5,724 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536 ESPINOZA; ROBERT DAVID Agency Nos.
SALVADOR-GOMEZ; DAVID ANGEL A246-606-483
SALVADOR-ROJAS; KORINA A246-606-482
SALVADOR-ROJAS,
A246-606-484
A246-606-485
Petitioners,
v. ORDER
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge: Dissent by Judge VanDyke
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c)
and Circuit Rule 40-3. The order issued by the three-judge panel on October 24,
2025, which was previously stayed, is vacated.
FILED
FEB 20 2026
Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi, No. 24-7536 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK VANDYKE, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the grant of rehearing en banc: U.S. COURT OF APPEALS