Beddingfield

Unity Beddingfield v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20263:23-cv-05896California3,044 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 UNITY BEDDINGFIELD, Case No. 23-cv-05896-EMC (EMC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., et al., Docket Nos. 57, 58. Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Unity Beddingfield sued her employer Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”), along with several UPS managers, for employment discrimination based on her race, gender and pregnancy. The Court previously allowed her claims to proceed against UPS. Dkt. No. 29. Now two of the UPS managers that she sued in an individual capacity – Renee Rea and Omar Parra – move to dismiss the claims against them under Rules 8 and 12(b)(6). Dkt. Nos. 57, 58. The Court finds this matter suitable to disposition on the papers. For the reasons stated below, the Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. 20 I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND 22 Procedural Background Plaintiff filed her initial complaint on September 5, 2023 in California state court. Dkt. No. 1.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.