Wondershare Technology Group Co., Ltd., et al. v. Superace Software Technology Co., Ltd., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20263:25-cv-07322California2,614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WONDERSHARE TECHNOLOGY Case No. 25-cv-07322-JSC GROUP CO., LTD., et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS 9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 38, 39

SUPERACE SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY

CO., LTD, et al., Defendants. 12 Before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 38, 39.) Plaintiffs and Defendants are companies who offer competing PDF software products. Plaintiffs allege various federal and California state claims for false advertising and unfair competition. Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint in its entirety on the grounds of forum non conveniens, lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction, insufficient service of process, and failure to state a claim. After carefully considering the arguments and briefing submitted, the Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS Defendants’ motion, and DISMISSES Plaintiffs’ complaint in its entirety under the doctrine of forum non…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.