Wondershare Technology Group Co., Ltd., et al. v. Superace Software Technology Co., Ltd., et al.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WONDERSHARE TECHNOLOGY Case No. 25-cv-07322-JSC GROUP CO., LTD., et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS 9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 38, 39 10

SUPERACE SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY

11 CO., LTD, et al., Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 38, 14 39.)1 Plaintiffs and Defendants are companies who offer competing PDF software products. 15 Plaintiffs allege various federal and California state claims for false advertising and unfair 16 competition. Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint in its entirety on the grounds of 17 forum non conveniens, lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction, insufficient service of 18 process, and failure to state a claim. 19 After carefully considering the arguments and briefing submitted, the Court concludes oral 20 argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS Defendants’ motion, and 21 DISMISSES Plaintiffs’ complaint in its entirety under the doctrine of forum non…