UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROSALEE V. ZARROW, Case No. 25-cv-08821-LJC
Plaintiff,
FURTHER ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 9 EXPERIAN CREDIT BUREAU, Defendant.
I. BACKGROUND The Court previously granted Plaintiff Rosalee V. Zarrow’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and screened her Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S. Code Section 1915(e). ECF No. 7. Plaintiff’s Complaint asserted a claim against Defendant Experian Credit Bureau (Experian) pursuant to 42 U.S. Code Section 1983, contending that Experian violated her Fourteenth Amendment rights. See ECF No. 1 (Compl.). The Court explained that Plaintiff’s Section 1983 claim failed because Section 1983 authorizes lawsuits against government officials and entities, not private parties, and Experian was not a government official or entity. ECF No. 7 at 3. The Court permitted Plaintiff to file an amended complaint, directing her to “include a short and plain statement of facts explain[ing] what Defendant did that harmed Plaintiff” and…