Valente Ramirez-Palma v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 202620-73269California718 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VALENTE RAMIREZ-PALMA, No. 20-73269

Petitioner, Agency No. A213-083-450

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 18, 2026** El Centro, California

Before: TALLMAN and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and MONTENEGRO,*** District Judge.

Valente Ramirez-Palma (“Ramirez”), a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Ruth Bermudez Montenegro, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. appeal of an Immigration Judge’s decision (“IJ”) denying cancellation of removal.

“Our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.