Langford

United States v. Langford

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 202623-3681California789 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3681 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:18-cr-00195-GW-1 v. MEMORANDUM*

JEFFREY LANGFORD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 4, 2026 Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, BRESS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Jeffrey Langford appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence

seized from a warranted search of his apartment (“March 12 warrant”) and from a

warranted search of his cellphones (“March 19 warrant”). We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s denial of a

suppression motion and its application of the good-faith exception to the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. exclusionary rule, and we review for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.