Kessler

Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Kessler

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 202623-3410California1,286 words

Opinion

Opinion

facts in the record.” In re Open Med. Inst., Inc., 639 B.R. 169, 180 (B.A.P. 9th Cir.

2022) (citation omitted), aff’d sub nom. In re Kogelnik, No. 22-60018, 2023 WL

7122577 (9th Cir. Oct. 30, 2023).

In determining the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of a proposed

settlement agreement, the court must consider:

(a) The probability of success in the litigation; (b) the difficulties, if any, to be encountered in the matter of collection; (c) the complexity of the litigation involved, and the expense, inconvenience and delay necessarily attending it; [and] (d) the paramount interest of the creditors and a proper deference to their reasonable views in the premises.

In re A & C Props., 784 F.2d at 1381 (citation omitted).

The bankruptcy court correctly identified the In re A & C factors as the

relevant legal standard. See In re Berkeley Del. Ct., LLC, 834 F.3d 1036, 1039 (9th

25-1846 Cir. 2016) (citing In re A & C as authority for interpreting whether a settlement is

fair and equitable under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9019(a)). The

bankruptcy court applied that standard in a manner that is supported by the record

and is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.