Luis Galvan Camarillo v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 202620-71046California478 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS GALVAN CAMARILLO, No. 20-71046 Agency No. Petitioner, A201-237-417 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: McKEOWN, FORREST, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Luis Galvan Camarillo seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) decision affirming the denial of his application for cancellation of

removal. The only question before us is whether Galvan Camarillo satisfied his

burden under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D) to demonstrate “exceptional and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). extremely unusual hardship” to a qualifying relative. “Where, as here, the BIA

agrees with the [Immigration Judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.