Ganey

Ganey v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 202624-4547California752 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHELLE DIANE GANEY; MICHAEL No. 24-4547 JAMES GANEY, Jr., D.C. No. 3:23-cv-01448-CAB-AHG Plaintiffs - Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; JANETTE

VILLA; TOREE RUIZ; JANEA

AYALA; CHRISTOPHER

TAYLOR; MARY SHEHEE; LILIANA

IRIBE-MORENO; JADE NIETO; NICK

MACCHIONE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Michelle Diane Ganey and Michael James Ganey, Jr., appeal pro se from the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s judgment dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising out of

juvenile dependency…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.