Estate of Burkhard Ketschau v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 202624-6956California361 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESTATE OF BURKHARD KETSCHAU, No. 24-6956 by and through Personal Representatives D.C. No. 2:24-cv-01437-LK Ryan Ketschau and Ruby E Ketschau; RYAN KETSCHAU; RUBY E.

KETSCHAU, MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Lauren J. King, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs appeal pro se from the termination of their civil action for failure

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). We

have jurisdiction under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.