Cisneros-Flores
Cisneros-Flores v. Warden
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 23 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALEJANDRO CISNEROS-FLORES, No. 25-5849 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 4:25-cv-00267-RM--MAA v.
MEMORANDUM*
WARDEN - Safford F.C.C.,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2026**
Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner Alejandro Cisneros-Flores appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under
U.S.C. § 2241. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C § 1291. Reviewing de novo,
see Lane v. Salazar, 911 F.3d 942, 947 (9th Cir. 2018), we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cisneros-Flores seeks restoration of time credits earned…