Ou-Young

Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young v. Patrick D. Robbins, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20263:25-cv-08983California1,548 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 KUANG-BAO PAUL OU-YOUNG, Case No. 25-cv-08983-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v.

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF THIRD

PREFILING ORDER

PATRICK D. ROBBINS, et al., Defendants.

Now pending is a motion by Defendants Patrick D. Robbins, Acting U.S. Attorney, Pamela T. Johann, Chief, Civil Division, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Kelsey Helland, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, and Mark B. Busby, Clerk, U.S. District Court, for the entry of a third prefiling order against pro se Plaintiff Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young. See Vex. Mot. (dkt. 17); Reply (dkt. 22). Plaintiff has opposed this motion. See Opp’n (dkt. 20). The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), VACATES the hearing previously set for February 13, 2026, and GRANTS the motion in part. Under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), district courts have the power to enjoin “litigants with abusive and lengthy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.