Tate
Tate v. Chavez
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 202624-5349California565 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LIONEL TATE, Sr., No. 24-5349 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00211-DJC-CKD Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
L. CHAVEZ; CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION; UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA, DAVIS; J. MANN;
MICHAEL GEOFFREY MOORE; M. GO;
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA; L. MEYERS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Court, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2026**
Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Lionel Tate, Sr., appeals pro se from the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth