Tate

Tate v. Chavez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 202624-5349California565 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIONEL TATE, Sr., No. 24-5349 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00211-DJC-CKD Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

L. CHAVEZ; CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION; UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA, DAVIS; J. MANN;

MICHAEL GEOFFREY MOORE; M. GO;

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA; L. MEYERS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Court, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Lionel Tate, Sr., appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth

Amendment violations and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.