Kerr

Kerr v. Warden

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 202625-236California416 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORMAN ALAN KERR, No. 25-236 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 2:23-cv-02134-DJC-AC v.

MEMORANDUM*

WARDEN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Court, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Norman Alan Kerr appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see

Lane v. Swain, 910 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir. 2018), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Kerr claims that the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) has withheld…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.