Navellier

Navellier v. Putnam

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 2026A172077MCalifornia5,888 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chou, J.

Filed 2/23/26 (unmodified opinion attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION *

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

LOUIS NAVELLIER et al., A172077 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (City & County of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. CGC-19-574779) v.

ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION AND DENYING

DONALD PUTNAM et al., REHEARING Defendants and Respondents. [NO CHANGE IN

JUDGMENT]

BY THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on February 2, 2026, be modified as follows:

1. In the first full paragraph on page 7, modify the citation after the last sentence to the following:

(Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C. v. Jeffries (8th Cir. 2011) 653 F.3d 755, 762 (Ritchie).)

2. In the last full paragraph on page 7, add the following after the last sentence:

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1105(b) and 8.1110, this

opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts B, C, and D of the Discussion.

1 In their petition for rehearing, defendants now appear to suggest that NAI’s listing of the attorney fee award as an undisputed liability…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.