Mahon

Mahon v. Mainsail, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 202624-3589California608 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK MAHON, No. 24-3589 D.C. No. 4:20-cv-01523-YGR Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MAINSAIL, LLC; SHORELINE

ENTERTAINMENT INC.; SAM EIGEN;

MORRIS RUSKIN,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

ENTERTAINMENT ONE LICENSING

US, INC., ENTERTAINMENT ONE,

LTD., E1 ENTERTAINMENT UK, LTD.,

ENTERTAINMENT ONE U.S., LP,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Mark Mahon appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

his action alleging copyright infringement, trafficking in counterfeit labels, and

state law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.