Mahon

Mahon v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 202624-3571California546 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK MAHON, No. 24-3571 D.C. No. 4:20-cv-01534-YGR Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

APPLE INC.; ITUNES STORE; APPLE

DISTRIBUTION INTERNATIONAL,

LTD.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Mark Mahon appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment and

dismissal order in his action alleging copyright infringement in connection with a

film he created. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). novo. Csutoras v. Paradise High Sch., 12 F.4th 960, 965 (9th Cir. 2021)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.