Liangfang Weng v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202621-70342California893 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIANGFANG WENG, No. 21-70342 Agency No. Petitioner, A209-762-744 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2026** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: BYBEE, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges

Petitioner Liangfang Weng, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing her appeal from an

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of her asylum and withholding of removal claims on

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the ground that she was not credible. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a),

and we deny the petition.

Our “review is limited to those grounds explicitly relied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.