Paz-Flores

Paz-Flores v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202625-1897California669 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JENNIFER PAOLA PAZ-FLORES; No. 25-1897 LUCAS JOSUE ESCOBAR-PAZ, Agency Nos.

A246-945-235

Petitioners, A246-945-234 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2026** Seattle, Washington

Before: PAEZ and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and KASUBHAI, District Judge.***

Jennifer Paola Paz-Flores and her minor son (collectively, “Petitioners”), both

natives and citizens of Honduras, petition for review of the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Mustafa T. Kasubhai, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.