Lee v. L3harris Technologies, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202624-7295California742 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PRESTON LEE, No. 24-7295 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 1:20-cv-00489-LEK-KJM v.
MEMORANDUM*
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 10, 2026** Honolulu, Hawaii
Before: BYBEE, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges
Appellant Preston Lee appeals the district court’s order granting Appellee
L3Harris Technologies, Inc’s motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Although we review a grant of summary judgment de novo,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). we review a district court’s decision to apply the sham affidavit rule for abuse of
discretion. See…