People v. Eastus CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 2026C102974California1,215 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mauro, J.

Filed 2/25/26 P. v. Eastus CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C102974

v. (Super. Ct. No. 24CR0731)

DUSTIN IRA EASTUS,

Defendant and Appellant.

In September 2023, defendant Dustin Ira Eastus robbed a 14-year-old at gunpoint, taking the teenager’s bicycle worth approximately $1,000. A jury convicted defendant of second degree robbery (Pen Code, § 211) and found true an aggravating circumstance that he used a weapon (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.421(a)(2)).1 Following defendant’s agreement to a court trial on certain bifurcated matters, the trial court found true allegations that defendant had a prior strike conviction (§ 667, subds. (b)-(i)) and a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.