Ramos

Ramos v. Shalaby CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 2026C104197California2,018 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/25/26 Ramos v. Shalaby CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

LYNDA RAMOS, C104197

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. STK-CV-

UNPI-2025-0002776)

v.

ANDREW SHALABY,

Defendant and Appellant.

Plaintiff Lynda Ramos sued her former attorney defendant Andrew Shalaby alleging multiple causes of action after he asserted an allegedly fraudulent lien for attorney fees to an insurance company. Defendant brought a motion to strike strategic lawsuit against public participation (anti-SLAPP), under Code of Civil Procedure1 section 425.16, seeking to strike plaintiff’s entire complaint; the trial court denied the motion. On appeal, defendant contends the “gravamen” of plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.