People v. Ratliff CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
In 2002, a jury found Ratliff guilty of assault with a deadly weapon and possession
of a firearm by a felon. (§ 245, subd. (a)(1); former § 12021, subd. (a)(1); People v.
Ratliff (Aug. 24, 2004, E032100) [nonpub. opn.] pp. 4-5 (Ratliff I).) The jury also found
that Ratliff committed both offenses for the benefit of a criminal street gang. (§ 186.22,
subd. (b)(1); Ratliff I, E032100, p. 5.) In addition, the allegations that he personally used
a firearm in connection with the assault count (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)), had two prior strikes
under the three strikes law (§ 667, subds. (b)-(i)), had two prior serious felony
convictions (§ 667, subd. (a)), and had served two prior prison terms (former § 667.5,
subd. (b)) were all found true. The court sentenced him to 24 years in prison plus an
indeterminate term of 25 years to life. The court stayed the sentences for the prior prison
term enhancements.
On Ratliff’s appeal from the judgment, we agreed with him that the court erred by
staying his sentences for the prior prison term enhancements, and we directed the court to
strike the enhancements. (Ratliff I, supra, E032100, p. 21.) The court struck the
enhancements…