Octaviano Urias-Sepulveda v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 202620-73617California1,056 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OCTAVIANO URIAS-SEPULVEDA, No. 20-73617
Petitioner, Agency No.
A209-138-822
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted February 5, 2026 Phoenix, Arizona
Before: BERZON, CALLAHAN, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Octaviano Urias-Sepulveda, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the denial by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) of his motion to
reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We
review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Valeriano v.
Gonzales, 474 F.3d 669, 672 (9th Cir. 2007). “The BIA abuses its discretion when
it acts arbitrarily, irrationally, or contrary to the law, and when it fails to provide a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. reasoned explanation for…