Hyde

Hyde v. The Grove La Mesa CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 2026D085362California5,964 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/26/26 Hyde v. The Grove La Mesa CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID HYDE, D085362

Plaintiff,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2021- 00005732-CU-PO-CTL) THE GROVE LA MESA, INC et al.,

Defendant,

BENJAMIN PAVONE,

Objector and Appellant.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Robert C. Longstreth, Judge. Affirmed. Pavone & Fonner and Benjamin Pavone for Objector and Appellant. Purdy & Bailey and Micah L. Bailey for Defendant.

The defendants in the underlying lawsuit brought a motion for sanctions under Code of Civil Procedure sections 128.5 and 128.7 after Benjamin Pavone and his law firm, Pavone & Fonner, LLP, filed a meritless motion asserting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.