Woodhouse
Woodhouse v. State Bar of Cal.
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 2/27/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, B346662
Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 25STCV02208
THE STATE BAR OF
CALIFORNIA ET AL.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Robert B. Broadbelt, Judge. Affirmed. Benjamin Woodhouse in pro. per. for Plaintiff and Appellant. Office of General Counsel of the State Bar of California, Ellin Davtyan, Kirsten Galler and Raymond R. Rollan for Defendant and Respondent the State Bar of California. Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Kristin A. Linsley and Austin Schwing for Defendants and Respondents Meta Platforms, Inc. and Nike, Inc. Davis Wright Tremaine and Dan Laidman for Defendant and Respondent Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Matthew R. Reed and John B. Kenney for Defendant and Respondent Alphabet, Inc. ____________________ The trial court ruled Benjamin Woodhouse is a vexatious litigant. We affirm this finding. We hold that, as a matter of law, Woodhouse’s…