Woodhouse

Woodhouse v. State Bar of Cal.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2026B346662California6,744 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/27/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, B346662

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 25STCV02208

THE STATE BAR OF

CALIFORNIA ET AL.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Robert B. Broadbelt, Judge. Affirmed. Benjamin Woodhouse in pro. per. for Plaintiff and Appellant. Office of General Counsel of the State Bar of California, Ellin Davtyan, Kirsten Galler and Raymond R. Rollan for Defendant and Respondent the State Bar of California. Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Kristin A. Linsley and Austin Schwing for Defendants and Respondents Meta Platforms, Inc. and Nike, Inc. Davis Wright Tremaine and Dan Laidman for Defendant and Respondent Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Matthew R. Reed and John B. Kenney for Defendant and Respondent Alphabet, Inc. ____________________ The trial court ruled Benjamin Woodhouse is a vexatious litigant. We affirm this finding. We hold that, as a matter of law, Woodhouse’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.