Ribstein

Ribstein v. Marx CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2026B338174California4,292 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/27/26 Ribstein v. Marx CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

RYAN RIBSTEIN, B338174

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 23VERO01759) v.

MIA MARX,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Karen Moskowitz, Judge. Affirmed. Mia Marx, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Ryan Ribstein, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Respondent.

______________________________ Mia Marx appeals from an order granting respondent Ryan Ribstein’s petition for a Code of Civil Procedure section 527.61 civil harassment restraining order (CHRO) against her. We affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A. Alleged Fraud on Marx Marx and Ribstein…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.