People v. Stewart CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2026C102503California2,455 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/27/26 P. v. Stewart CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Tehama) ----

THE PEOPLE, C102503

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 24CR1776)

v.

STEELE STEWART,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Steele Stewart pled guilty to manslaughter and attempted murder, and his counsel admitted certain aggravating factors were present. Stewart claims that the trial court erred by aggravating his sentence based on underlying facts that were not properly proven under Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (b).1 Alternatively, Stewart claims the trial court improperly relied on facts used to impose enhancements to aggravate his sentence. The People contend the parties’ stipulation to the “presen[ce]” of

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.