HorizonMatrix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ASTRAL IP ENTERPRISE LTD., Case No. 5:24-cv-07428-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART

v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT HORIZONMATRIX, Re: ECF No. 23 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff Astral IP Enterprise Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) sued Defendant HorizonMatrix (“Defendant”) for copyright infringement and violation of California’s unfair competition law. Compl., ECF No. 1. Defendant has neither answered nor appeared in this action despite being served, so Plaintiff now moves for default judgment. Mot., ECF No. 23. The Court finds the motion suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion for default judgment. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a Canadian company that designs and creates various mobile applications and authorizes use of those applications to developer accounts on…