Jose R. Solano v. Orange Kangaroo, LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20268:24-cv-01587California1,327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE R. SOLANO, Case No. SA CV 24-01587-DMG (PD)

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND ADOPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF ORANGE KANGAROO, LLC, et al.,

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

15 Defendants. JUDGE

17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the following three 18 motions filed by Plaintiff Jose R. Solano (“Plaintiff”): (1) motion for 19 reconsideration of Order and Judgment under Local Rule 7-18 and Federal Rule of 20 Civil Procedure 59(e) [Doc. # 69]; (2) motion to set aside Judgment pursuant to 21 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) [Doc. # 73]; and (3) request for certification 22 of Interlocutory Appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) [Doc. # 72]; Defendants 23 Western Progressive Trustee, LLC d/b/a Western Progressive, LLC, Karita 24 Robinson and Yosemite Lopez’s oppositions to the motions [Doc. ## 77–79]; 25 Plaintiff’s replies [Doc. ## 81–83]; Plaintiff’s notice of non-opposition by the 26 Orange…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.