People v. Mahan CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 2, 2026D086126California524 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/27/26 P. v. Mahan CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D086126

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SCD303978)

v.

NEMUEL MAHAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Marian F. Gaston, Judge. Affirmed as modified and remanded with directions. Jake E. Stanton, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Charles C. Ragland, Chief Attorney General, Arlene A. Sevidal, Assistant Attorney General, Eric A. Swenson and Christopher P. Beesley, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Nemuel Mahan pled guilty to felony vandalism (Pen. Code, §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.