Sanwa Technologies v. Titus CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 2, 2026B347323California1,262 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tamzarian, J.

background information that follows is taken from the trial court’s case register. In August 2024, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants in the trial court. Although that complaint is not in the appellate record, the judgment indicates that the complaint alleged causes of action for rescission, declaratory judgment, and permanent injunction. The contract that formed the basis of the legal dispute between Sanwa and Titus is likewise not in the record. Defendants filed an answer and cross-complaint. Plaintiff demurred to the cross-complaint. The answer, cross-complaint, demurrer, and order adjudicating the demurrer are not in the record. In January 2025, Sanwa filed a motion for summary judgment against Titus. The court granted the motion in April

Hayat Bi is not a party to this appeal.

2 2025. Sanwa’s moving papers, Titus’s opposition papers, and the court order granting the motion are not in the record. The reporters’ transcript of the hearing is also not in the record. On May 21, 2025, the trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendants on all three causes of action. Titus timely appealed.

DISCUSSION

I. Titus has not met his burden of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.