Piltan

Piltan v. Novell CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 2026B327357California1,349 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/2/26 Piltan v. Novell CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

BABAK PILTAN, B327357

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant, and Los Angeles County Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 19STCV14650 v.

MARIO NOVELL,

Defendant, Cross-complainant, and Appellant.

APPEAL from a post-judgment order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Steven J. Kleifield, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

Carter Law Firm and Corey Alan Carter Law Offices of William B. Hanley and William B. Hanley for Defendant, Cross- complainant, and Appellant

Joseph A. Hearst for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant, and Respondent.

_____________________________ On February 21, 2023, appellant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.