Boylan
United States v. Boylan
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 3 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 24-3077, 24-6045 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cr-00482-GW-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
JERRY NEHL BOYLAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 2, 2025 Pasadena, California
Before: CALLAHAN, OWENS, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Defendant Jerry Boylan appeals from his conviction for seaman’s
manslaughter in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1115. He raises jury instruction and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. expert witness testimony challenges.1 As the parties are familiar with the facts, we
do not recount them here. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we
affirm.
1. Boylan argues that the district court erred in delivering its jury instruction
on causation under 18 U.S.C. § 1115. We decline to decide…