Soriano-Garcia

Soriano-Garcia v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 202624-7179California1,165 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 3 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RIGOBERTO SORIANO-GARCIA, No. 24-7179 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-080-788 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 27, 2026** Richland, Washington

Before: SUNG, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Rigoberto Soriano-Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration

judge’s denial of his applications for cancellation of removal, asylum, withholding

of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Soriano-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Garcia seeks cancellation of removal based on hardship to his wife and children…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.