Bondi
Mendoza Dimas v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 202624-5554California877 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 3 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DESENIA MENDOZA DIMAS, et al., No. 24-5554 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A246-088-574
A246-088-575
v.
A246-088-576
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 27, 2026** Richland, Washington
Before: SUNG, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Desenia Mendoza Dimas and her two children, natives and citizens of
Mexico, petition for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals
(“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ’s”) denial of
their applications for asylum and relief under the Convention Against Torture
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), and we deny…