Bondi

Mendoza Dimas v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 202624-5554California877 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 3 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DESENIA MENDOZA DIMAS, et al., No. 24-5554 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A246-088-574

A246-088-575

v.

A246-088-576

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 27, 2026** Richland, Washington

Before: SUNG, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Desenia Mendoza Dimas and her two children, natives and citizens of

Mexico, petition for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ’s”) denial of

their applications for asylum and relief under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), and we deny…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.