Gray
United States v. Gray
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 3 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-1325 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:21-cv-03126-TOR v.
MEMORANDUM*
RICK T. GRAY,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
GRAY FARMS & CATTLE CO. LLC,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 27, 2026** Richland, Washington
Before: SUNG, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Defendant Rick Gray appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment
in the government’s favor on its False Claims Act (“FCA”) claims alleging that Gray
filed false crop insurance claims in 2015. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Terpin…