Lusine Hakhverdyan

I. BACKGROUND

The Disgorgement Motion relates to Debtor’s “Motion to Vacate Extension Order, Declaration that Stipulations Are Void Ab Initio, Request to Restore Rule 4007(c) Deadline, and 3 Request for Sanctions” (the “First Relief Motion”); “Motion to Vacate Void Extension Orders”; 4 “Motion to Strike All Unauthorized Stipulations”; “Motion to Sanction Attorney Misconduct” 5 and “Motion to Bar Any Further § 523 Actions as Time-Barred” (collectively with the First Relief Motion, "Debtor’s FRCP 60 Motions"). Debtor’s FRCP 60 Motions are filed in Debtor’s 8 bankruptcy case, Case No. 1:25-bk-11049 (the “Bankruptcy Case”). 9 The full factual background regarding the Disgorgement Motion and Debtor’s FRCP 60 10 Motions is included in the Court’s ruling on Debtor’s FRCP 60 Motions and is incorporated in 11 this decision. In summary, the Disgorgement Motion concerns the unauthorized decisions of Debtor’s 14 former bankruptcy counsel, Mr. Gorginian, to agree multiple times to extend the deadline under 15 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4004 and 4007(c) for a creditor to file a complaint against Debtor based on 11 16 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2), (4) and (6) or 11 U.S.C. § 727. As…