Uber Technologies, Inc. v. City of Seattle
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 202625-228California11,809 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; No. 25-228
PORTIER, LLC,
D.C. No. 2:24-cv-02103- Plaintiffs - Appellants,
MJP
and
OPINION
MAPLEBEAR INC., doing business as Instacart,
Intervenor-Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF SEATTLE,
Defendant - Appellee.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., No. 25-231
PORTIER, LLC,
D.C. No. 2:24-cv-02103- Plaintiffs,
MJP
and
MAPLEBEAR INC., doing business as Instacart, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. CITY OF SEATTLE
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SEATTLE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted July 10, 2025 Seattle, Washington
Filed March 4, 2026
Before: Susan P. Graber, Richard R. Clifton, and Mark J. Bennett, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Clifton; Partial Dissent by Judge Bennett
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. CITY OF SEATTLE
SUMMARY *
First Amendment
The panel affirmed the district court’s denial of a motion by Uber Technologies, Inc. and Maplebear Inc. for a preliminary injunction to enjoin…