Jenson

Jenson v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 202624-7307California994 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 4 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-7307

JORDAN JENSON,

D.C. No. 4:23-cv-05027-LRS Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Lonny R. Suko, Senior Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 27, 2026** Richland, Washington

Before: SUNG, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Jordan Jenson appeals the district court’s order affirming

an administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of Jenson’s application for childhood

social security benefits. We review the district court’s decision de novo. Luther v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Berryhill, 891 F.3d 872, 875 (9th Cir. 2018). We will not overturn the ALJ’s

decision “unless it is either not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.