Virk
Virk v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 202625-1861California665 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAR 4 2026
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HARPREET SINGH VIRK, No. 25-1861
Petitioner, Agency No. v. A208-177-745
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals*
Submitted March 2, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, District Judge.***
Petitioner Harpreet Singh Virk, a native and citizen of India, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of asylum. Because the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of the case, we need…