Virk

Virk v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 202625-1861California665 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 4 2026

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARPREET SINGH VIRK, No. 25-1861

Petitioner, Agency No. v. A208-177-745

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals*

Submitted March 2, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, District Judge.***

Petitioner Harpreet Singh Virk, a native and citizen of India, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of asylum. Because the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of the case, we need…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.