Torres

Torres v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 202625-4774California588 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 4 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO JESUS TORRES, No. 25-4774 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-637-243 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 18, 2026 **

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge FRIEDLAND.

Antonio Jesus Torres, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“CAT”), and denying his motions for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.