Ortiz-Herrera

Ortiz-Herrera v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 202625-1660California798 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 4 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANDY YANORIS ORTIZ-HERRERA, No. 25-1660 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-739-951 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 2, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, Chief District Judge.***

Petitioner Sandy Yanoris Ortiz-Herrera (“Ortiz-Herrera”) petitions our Court

to vacate the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of the Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, United States Chief District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum and withholding of removal based on her ability…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.