Piltan

Piltan v. Novell CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 2026B327357MCalifornia1,514 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/4/26 Piltan v. Novell CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

BABAK PILTAN, B327357

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant, and Los Angeles County Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 19STCV14650 v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

MARIO NOVELL,

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] Defendant, Cross-complainant, and Appellant.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on March 2, 2026, be modified as follows: The counsel listed for Defendant, Cross-complainant, and Appellant is deleted and replaced with the following: “Carter Law Firm and Corey Alan Carter for Defendant, Cross- complainant, and Appellant.” There is no change in the judgment.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.