Echeverria
Echeverria v. Bandy CA4/3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 3/4/26 Echeverria v. Bandy CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
GLORIA ECHEVERRIA,
Plaintiff and Appellant, G064893
v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2022- 01288605)
AMY BANDY,
OPINION
Defendant and Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Michael J. Strickroth, Judge. Affirmed. Graham & Associates and Anthony G. Graham for Plaintiff and Appellant. Cole Pedroza, Kenneth R. Pedroza, Nathan J. Novak; Schafer McMahon, Terrence J. Schafer and Shahla Couper for Defendant and Respondent. Gloria Echeverria appeals a judgment entered after Amy Bandy’s motion for summary judgment was granted. As we will explain below, Bandy shifted the burden on each cause of action to…