James
James v. Asian Family Market
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 5 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HENRY JAMES, No. 24-2656 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00212-RSL v. MEMORANDUM*
ASIAN FAMILY MARKET; KIVON
TAYLOR; C. SUN; DELGADO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 5, 2026**
Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant Henry James (“James”) appeals the district court’s grant
of summary judgment for Defendants-Appellees on all claims brought under
U.S.C. § 1983, and from its denial of James’ motions to appoint counsel and to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). compel discovery. The parties are familiar with the underlying…