James

James v. Asian Family Market

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 202624-2656California1,154 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 5 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HENRY JAMES, No. 24-2656 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00212-RSL v. MEMORANDUM*

ASIAN FAMILY MARKET; KIVON

TAYLOR; C. SUN; DELGADO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 5, 2026**

Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Henry James (“James”) appeals the district court’s grant

of summary judgment for Defendants-Appellees on all claims brought under

U.S.C. § 1983, and from its denial of James’ motions to appoint counsel and to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). compel discovery. The parties are familiar with the underlying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.