Francisco Hernandez v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 202621-70651California465 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 5 2026

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO GUILLERMO No. 21-70651 HERNANDEZ, Agency Nos.

A208-468-759

Petitioner,

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Francisco Guillermo Hernandez is a native and citizen of Mexico

who seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his

application for cancellation of removal, asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review constitutional

claims, such as the due process…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.