Bondi

Ramirez Ramirez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 202624-6368California762 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 6 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ENRIQUE RAMIREZ RAMIREZ, No. 24-6368 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-699-792 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 4, 2026** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, BEA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Enrique Ramirez Ramirez (“Petitioner”) petitions for review of a decision of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which dismissed his appeal of an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for cancellation of removal

under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). We have jurisdiction to review the petition pursuant

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). We deny the petition. Because the parties are familiar

with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.